<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: replying to an e-mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/</link>
	<description>A computer programmer&#039;s commentary on news, Linux, programming, music, web design, trivia, humor, usability and whatever else strikes his fancy at the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babs</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>Babs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>I generally respond at the top of the old email or I might just start a whole new email.  Most people respond to my emails in the same manner; but, I have noticed that if there are several things to be addressed many people will miss certain points unless they respond throughout - line by line.  It does make the email lengthy, but at least all points have been covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally respond at the top of the old email or I might just start a whole new email.  Most people respond to my emails in the same manner; but, I have noticed that if there are several things to be addressed many people will miss certain points unless they respond throughout &#8211; line by line.  It does make the email lengthy, but at least all points have been covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4287</guid>
		<description>I learned that when I replied to every paragraph and the person responded asking why I had only replied to the first part of the e-mail.

I&#039;ve since stopped doing it because it confused people so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned that when I replied to every paragraph and the person responded asking why I had only replied to the first part of the e-mail.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since stopped doing it because it confused people so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4286</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4286</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so much easier to just not respond.

Actually, if the email is short, I&#039;ll respond at the bottom. If it is more lengthy and several topics are discussed, I&#039;ll snip out the unnecessary stuff (heavily in threads) and reply below the appropriate part. However, most people outside of Geekdom don&#039;t understand this method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so much easier to just not respond.</p>
<p>Actually, if the email is short, I&#8217;ll respond at the bottom. If it is more lengthy and several topics are discussed, I&#8217;ll snip out the unnecessary stuff (heavily in threads) and reply below the appropriate part. However, most people outside of Geekdom don&#8217;t understand this method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>Christine: I just sent you one.

Jason: That&#039;s true, it depends on who you&#039;re sending it to.

Renee: Gmail does handle it by hiding the reply text, but it&#039;s just easier to delete it entirely (cuts down on the size of the e-mail).  I used to send back responses correcting people when they forwarded incorrect things, but then they usually stop sending anything and sometimes what they forward is amusing.  I now ignore most of the things they send, and hope for an occasional funny one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine: I just sent you one.</p>
<p>Jason: That&#8217;s true, it depends on who you&#8217;re sending it to.</p>
<p>Renee: Gmail does handle it by hiding the reply text, but it&#8217;s just easier to delete it entirely (cuts down on the size of the e-mail).  I used to send back responses correcting people when they forwarded incorrect things, but then they usually stop sending anything and sometimes what they forward is amusing.  I now ignore most of the things they send, and hope for an occasional funny one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>Work, I leave everything.  Gmail, I was under the impression I don&#039;t need to delete off the old because it seems to handle that for me if it&#039;s a back and forth conversation.  Personal, my biggest dilemma is if I reply to the sender or to reply to ALL when I reply with the Snopes link and a kindly note telling them to research before forwarding virus threats, petitions, urban legends, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work, I leave everything.  Gmail, I was under the impression I don&#8217;t need to delete off the old because it seems to handle that for me if it&#8217;s a back and forth conversation.  Personal, my biggest dilemma is if I reply to the sender or to reply to ALL when I reply with the Snopes link and a kindly note telling them to research before forwarding virus threats, petitions, urban legends, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>It depends upon who I&#039;m responding to.  If it&#039;s a friend or family member, especially my mother, I respond with either a completely new e-mail or with my response at the top.  In professional e-mail, I usually cut out as much of the cruft as possible and place my responses under each question or topic.  I think it makes the e-mail flow like a conversation that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends upon who I&#8217;m responding to.  If it&#8217;s a friend or family member, especially my mother, I respond with either a completely new e-mail or with my response at the top.  In professional e-mail, I usually cut out as much of the cruft as possible and place my responses under each question or topic.  I think it makes the e-mail flow like a conversation that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4282</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4282</guid>
		<description>Hi, can you please spare me a Gmail invite. I think it will solve most of my bulk mail problems. Thank you in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, can you please spare me a Gmail invite. I think it will solve most of my bulk mail problems. Thank you in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4276</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4276</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I almost always remove the previous e-mail when I&#039;m writing to someone with a Gmail account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I almost always remove the previous e-mail when I&#8217;m writing to someone with a Gmail account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>For Gmail users, I like A.  They don&#039;t need it anyway, it&#039;s a conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Gmail users, I like A.  They don&#8217;t need it anyway, it&#8217;s a conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Urich</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2004/10/12/replying-to-an-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Urich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=937#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  Personally I like using method C since I tend to have dificulty with structurin my message and this provides structure for me and stops me from meandering too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  Personally I like using method C since I tend to have dificulty with structurin my message and this provides structure for me and stops me from meandering too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.093 seconds using apc
Object Caching 318/321 objects using apc

Served from: dan.hersam.com @ 2012-05-22 10:19:48 -->
