<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the gender of your writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/</link>
	<description>A computer programmer&#039;s commentary on news, Linux, programming, music, web design, trivia, humor, usability and whatever else strikes his fancy at the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richy's Random Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy's Random Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fun: Gender Genie&lt;/strong&gt;
Well, according to The Gender Genie&#039;s analysis of my last couple of posts, I&#039;m female.... Hmm, unfortunately whilst I did spend last week with two lovely young women, I&#039;m definitely male myself.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fun: Gender Genie</strong><br />
Well, according to The Gender Genie&#8217;s analysis of my last couple of posts, I&#8217;m female&#8230;. Hmm, unfortunately whilst I did spend last week with two lovely young women, I&#8217;m definitely male myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanita.net</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanita.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gender Genie&lt;/strong&gt;
Supposedly it should be right 80% of the time, but the actual results from the Gender Genie show a 50-50 split between right and wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gender Genie</strong><br />
Supposedly it should be right 80% of the time, but the actual results from the Gender Genie show a 50-50 split between right and wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>I just found the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html&quot;&gt;gender genie&lt;/a&gt;, an implementation of the algorithm to detect between male and female writing.  I tested it with a few of &lt;a href=&quot;http://melsinbox.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Mel&#039;s blog&lt;/a&gt; entries and it thought she was male once, female three times.  However, it thought &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifeoflevi.com/blog.php&quot;&gt;Levi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ahoyhoy.org/&quot;&gt;Jason&lt;/a&gt; and I were, for the most part, female.  It&#039;s currently getting about 60% wrong though, so the algorithm needs some tweaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found the <a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html">gender genie</a>, an implementation of the algorithm to detect between male and female writing.  I tested it with a few of <a href="http://melsinbox.blogspot.com/">Mel&#8217;s blog</a> entries and it thought she was male once, female three times.  However, it thought <a href="http://www.lifeoflevi.com/blog.php">Levi</a>, <a href="http://ahoyhoy.org/">Jason</a> and I were, for the most part, female.  It&#8217;s currently getting about 60% wrong though, so the algorithm needs some tweaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 03:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>That makes sense.  Even though people probably spend more time thinking about what they write than what they say, it&#039;s coming from the same noodle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense.  Even though people probably spend more time thinking about what they write than what they say, it&#8217;s coming from the same noodle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 03:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>I was reading a book that made similar observations. It said that men like to talk about things and events (sports, politics, news, etc.), while women talked about people and their relationships, and their feelings about those relationships. I paid a bit more attention for a little while and noticed it in conversations as well, not just in writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading a book that made similar observations. It said that men like to talk about things and events (sports, politics, news, etc.), while women talked about people and their relationships, and their feelings about those relationships. I paid a bit more attention for a little while and noticed it in conversations as well, not just in writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the exact thing Meredith wrote.  I&#039;d like to think that I write fairly neutral, but  I&#039;m sure my snowblower posts would probably make the program seg-fault and spontaneously combust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the exact thing Meredith wrote.  I&#8217;d like to think that I write fairly neutral, but  I&#8217;m sure my snowblower posts would probably make the program seg-fault and spontaneously combust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>Crazy stuff.  And it doesn&#039;t even need to see your handwriting!  I wonder, though, how much of the measured difference between the writing of men and women is innate and how much is due to cultural expectations ingrained in our society.

As a side note, it seems like the technique they used was about the same as the Bayesian spam filters that are all the rage these days.  I&#039;ll bet you could train one of them in the same way to replicate the experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy stuff.  And it doesn&#8217;t even need to see your handwriting!  I wonder, though, how much of the measured difference between the writing of men and women is innate and how much is due to cultural expectations ingrained in our society.</p>
<p>As a side note, it seems like the technique they used was about the same as the Bayesian spam filters that are all the rage these days.  I&#8217;ll bet you could train one of them in the same way to replicate the experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting if they had a web-based version of this.  We could all plug in blog entries and see what we got.  I wonder if individual blog entries might return different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting if they had a web-based version of this.  We could all plug in blog entries and see what we got.  I wonder if individual blog entries might return different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>Despite my attempt to pull the wool over your eyes, I believe that most people assume I&#039;m female when I write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite my attempt to pull the wool over your eyes, I believe that most people assume I&#8217;m female when I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2003/07/10/the-gender-of-your-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=669#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I wonder how it would classify Mel...

I&#039;m picturing the movie Victor/Victoria now in my head. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I wonder how it would classify Mel&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m picturing the movie Victor/Victoria now in my head. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.076 seconds using apc
Object Caching 319/320 objects using apc

Served from: dan.hersam.com @ 2012-05-22 08:42:21 -->
