<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: poor grammar ain&#8217;t funny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/</link>
	<description>A computer programmer's commentary on news, Linux, programming, music, web design, trivia, humor, usability and whatever else strikes his fancy at the time.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harriet</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-142693</link>
		<dc:creator>Harriet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-142693</guid>
		<description>Sign on a McDonald's:

TACO SALADS IS BACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sign on a McDonald&#8217;s:</p>
<p>TACO SALADS IS BACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-139390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-139390</guid>
		<description>Very true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-139388</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-139388</guid>
		<description>Another common grammatical mistake: you're vs your.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another common grammatical mistake: you&#8217;re vs your.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-76370</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-76370</guid>
		<description>I meant to say, "Are you suggesting that Microsoft does not need to check their spells?"

See what happens when you don't proofread! Point taken! Poor grammar makes poor humor even less humorous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say, &#8220;Are you suggesting that Microsoft does not need to check their spells?&#8221;</p>
<p>See what happens when you don&#8217;t proofread! Point taken! Poor grammar makes poor humor even less humorous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-76367</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-76367</guid>
		<description>"Spelled" is the correct past tense of "spell" in English. "Spelt" would set me off because I am not British, and that is where that form is most commonly used.

Are you suggesting Microsoft does need to check their spells? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Spelled&#8221; is the correct past tense of &#8220;spell&#8221; in English. &#8220;Spelt&#8221; would set me off because I am not British, and that is where that form is most commonly used.</p>
<p>Are you suggesting Microsoft does need to check their spells? <img src='http://dan.hersam.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-76124</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-76124</guid>
		<description>"No one is perfect, so proofreading is a good way to catch your mistakes. A spellchecker is also helpful, especially if you’re a habitually poor speller."

I would have thought that a 'spellchecker' would be of most use to one who uses spells, eg Witches and Harry Potter etc.  Those of us who write would use a spelling checker. It's a Mircosoft thing I suppose - we have  got used to their terminology. It also annoys me when they use 'spelled' rather than 'spelt', but maybe that's just me !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No one is perfect, so proofreading is a good way to catch your mistakes. A spellchecker is also helpful, especially if you’re a habitually poor speller.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would have thought that a &#8217;spellchecker&#8217; would be of most use to one who uses spells, eg Witches and Harry Potter etc.  Those of us who write would use a spelling checker. It&#8217;s a Mircosoft thing I suppose - we have  got used to their terminology. It also annoys me when they use &#8217;spelled&#8217; rather than &#8217;spelt&#8217;, but maybe that&#8217;s just me !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-5791</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-5791</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/ain't"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; explains its history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.answers.com/ain't">Answers.com</a> explains its history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heiden</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>heiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>i cant understand the form Ain't ? . i have seen it in the title of songs such as Aint it funny ? and one Alicia keys song . can u explain it to me ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i cant understand the form Ain&#8217;t ? . i have seen it in the title of songs such as Aint it funny ? and one Alicia keys song . can u explain it to me ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-797</guid>
		<description>My spelling and grammar mistakes usually pop up out of laziness or just going to fast, but sometimes I see a word that I've typed and it just doesn't look right.  I could have typed it a thousand times before but for some reason, at that particular time, it looks completely foreign to me.  From the list you've given, I would say "effect/affect" is probably the one that makes me pause most often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spelling and grammar mistakes usually pop up out of laziness or just going to fast, but sometimes I see a word that I&#8217;ve typed and it just doesn&#8217;t look right.  I could have typed it a thousand times before but for some reason, at that particular time, it looks completely foreign to me.  From the list you&#8217;ve given, I would say &#8220;effect/affect&#8221; is probably the one that makes me pause most often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://dan.hersam.com/2002/11/23/poor-grammar-aint-funny/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=451#comment-798</guid>
		<description>I agree, affect vs. effect often has me rewording the sentence so I don't have to figure out which one to use.  By the way, I got another submission yesterday with a common one that I forgot to list:  Your vs. You're.  I hope that it's people's laziness, but I have a sneaking suspicion some people don't know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, affect vs. effect often has me rewording the sentence so I don&#8217;t have to figure out which one to use.  By the way, I got another submission yesterday with a common one that I forgot to list:  Your vs. You&#8217;re.  I hope that it&#8217;s people&#8217;s laziness, but I have a sneaking suspicion some people don&#8217;t know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

